How to ensure you find the right team

  • What is the single most valuable technical outcome in the next 90 days?
  • What are the non-negotiable constraints? Time to first release, security requirements, regulatory boundaries, and scalability targets.
  • What work exists today, and how is it documented? Specs, wireframes, API contracts, data models.
  • What will success look like by week 2, week 4, and week 12?

Remote, hybrid, or onsite: choose with intent

  • Remote: invest in writing, set core collaboration hours, record decisions, run crisp standups
  • Onsite: design focused collaboration windows, quiet hours, clear meeting policies
  • Hybrid: define days in-office, avoid second-class remote experience, double down on documentation
  • Contractors: great for scoped modules, migrations, or clearly defined integrations. Use for surge capacity or spike prototypes. Sign strong IP agreements.
  • Agencies: useful when you need a pod fast. Demand senior ownership, insist on code quality guardrails, and require you own the repo and infrastructure. Evaluate their lead’s calendar and who actually writes code.
  • Employees: critical for core product, long-term maintainability, and culture. They set standards, hold code context, and hire others.

Who to hire first: role architecture by stage

Startup StageCore Goal in 90 DaysIdeal ProfileRisk ProfileNotes
Pre-productValidate problem-solution fitSenior full-stack with product senseLower speed if over-engineeredShip ugly, learn fast, avoid heavy infra
MVP buildLaunch something realSenior builder with DevOps basicsRework if tech choices are misalignedChoose boring tech, optimize for delivery
Post-MVPStabilize and learnBackend plus mobile or frontend specialistBurnout risk if generalist stretches too thinAdd QA automation early
Early growthScale and improve reliabilityBackend lead, SRE, data personHiring debt if standards are weakIntroduce code review and metrics
Seed to Series ABuild engine for iterationTeam lead plus 2 to 4 ICs, product engineerProcess drag if over-structuredDefine career ladders and compensation bands
  • Must have: the 4 to 6 competencies that directly map to your 90-day goals. Example: implement secure OAuth flows, design normalized relational schema, set up CI that runs tests under 5 minutes.
  • Nice to have: things that help but do not block shipping. Example: Next.js experience, GraphQL proficiency, Terraform basics.
  • Non-negotiables: values and work style. Ownership, collaborative feedback, documentation discipline, calm under pressure.
  • Signals: exact behaviors or outputs that prove competency. Link each to a scoring rubric.
  • 1: Needs tasks broken down, escalates frequently without proposals
  • 2: Accepts tasks, completes with some guidance, communicates blockers
  • 3: Proactively defines work, unblocks themselves, resolves ambiguity
  • 4: Anticipates risks, influences priorities, mentors others on ownership

EVNE Developers is a dedicated software development team with a product mindset.
We’ll be happy to help you turn your idea into life and successfully monetize it.

How to keep your team until product scaling

  • Salary bands anchored to market data in your geography. Calibrate by seniority and scarcity.
  • Equity that is meaningful and real. Standard 4-year vesting with 1-year cliff, but consider front-loaded vesting for very early hires.
  • Benefits that help productivity. Health coverage, hardware stipend, home office support, smart conferences.
  • Signing bonus only when timing is tight. Keep it simple and transparent.
  • Salary: 150k to 180k, region dependent
  • Equity: 0.5 percent to 1.0 percent post-option pool, standard vesting
  • Rationale: top 3 technical contributor, expected to shape architecture and hiring
  • Pre-seed founders own 80 percent combined after pool setup
  • Option pool set to 15 percent
  • First hires take 2 percent total
  • New seed round adds 20 percent dilution
  • Net impact: founders at 64 percent, option pool refreshed to 10 to 15 percent as needed
StageCash EmphasisEquity EmphasisNotes
Pre-seedLow to moderateHighEquity tells the truth about upside
SeedModerateModerate to highBalance runway and hiring speed
Series AModerate to highModerateTeams expect stronger cash plus clarity on path
  • Proposes simpler features that hit the same user goal
  • Questions assumptions about default states, error states, and offline behavior
  • Measures what they ship and acts on the data
  • Writes small, meaningful PRs that map to user stories
  • Career growth paths, even if simple at first
  • Clear roadmap that respects learning
  • Psychological safety for admitting mistakes and fixing them
  • Tempo that avoids heroics and protects health
  • Documented decisions and a habit of writing
  • Visible progress, regular demos, and authentic recognition
  • Access control: principle of least privilege, offboarding checklist
  • Proper entity setup and cap table management
  • Invention assignment and confidentiality agreement for every contributor
  • Background checks where it is lawful and proportionate
  • Data processing agreements and basic privacy posture
  • Open-source license review for dependencies, plus a policy for new libraries
  • Vendor security review for critical services

Where to find great programmers, fast

  • Agencies can help, but manage incentives and insist on transparency
  • Warm referrals from trusted engineers and product leaders
  • Open-source contributors who touch your tooling stack
  • Technical communities that match your domain, think dbt for analytics or Rust forums for systems work
  • Targeted outbound on GitHub and LinkedIn with custom notes
  • Alumni networks, especially from companies shipping similar products
  • Niche job boards for your stack
  • References with specific questions about shipping, quality, and recovery from failure
  • 20-minute intro call focused on outcomes and constraints
  • 60-minute technical screen using real code or a focused debugging session
  • Optional take-home work sample that mirrors your product and takes 90 minutes or less
  • Culture and collaboration interview that probes habits, not buzzwords
  • Add a feature to a small repo with tests
  • Refactor a function to improve readability and performance
  • Write an integration that hits a real API with basic auth and rate limits
  • Look for a clean mental model and an ability to simplify
  • Describe the user story and acceptance criteria
  • Ask them to drive for 30 minutes and you drive for 30 minutes
  • Observe how they ask questions, structure work, and handle confusion

Proving the Concept for FinTech Startup with a Smart Algorithm for Detecting Subscriptions 

Scaling from Prototype into a User-Friendly and Conversational Marketing Platform

Interview loop that predicts startup performance

  • References: 2 to 3 calls, 15 minutes each
  • Intro call: mutual fit, 20 minutes
  • Technical screen: code walkthrough or pairing, 60 minutes
  • Design and product sense: architecture and reasoning, 60 minutes
  • Culture and ownership: behaviors, communication, learned lessons, 45 minutes
  • Founder chat: vision, runway, ways of working, 30 minutes
  • Ownership: finds clarity in chaos, proposes solutions, does not wait for permission on obvious fixes
  • Communication: concise updates, visibility into tradeoffs, proactive risk calls
  • Taste: chooses boring tech when it speeds delivery, reduces accidental complexity
  • Pragmatism: tests the right things, ships incrementally, fixes debt before it compounds
  • Resilience: recovers from failures with learning and calm
  • Strong fundamentals: data structures, complexity thinking used sparingly and wisely
  • Debugging: systematic approach, hypothesis driven, uses logs and metrics, isolates variables
  • Testing: understands boundaries, mocks correctly, values integration tests
  • Security: applies least privilege, avoids secrets in code, respects data handling requirements
  • DevOps: sets up CI quickly, favors infra as code, budgets for observability
  • Talks in buzzwords, thin on specifics
  • Over-indexes on purity, rejects pragmatic tradeoffs
  • Dismisses documentation or process as busywork
  • Blames teams for past failures without owning their part
  • Slow to respond or disorganized during the loop with no context
  • Collate scorecards before debating
  • Write a one-paragraph hiring justification tied to outcomes
  • If it is a no, say it quickly and give one helpful insight
  • Offer a trial day paid session if they want more signal
  • Verbal offer with salary, equity, benefits, and start date
  • Send a clean, readable offer letter
  • Share your vision memo and product roadmap
  • Provide references to you, so they can reference-check the company

Onboarding that pays off in the first month

  • Prepare laptop, access, repos, credentials
  • Send architecture overview and product brief
  • Assign a buddy and a small starter task
  • Ship a small change to production
  • Review coding standards, runbook, on-call basics if applicable
  • Schedule pairing sessions with adjacent roles
  • Own a minor feature end to end
  • Lead a design review for a small change
  • Write or improve documentation
  • Take ownership of a component or service
  • Propose a tech debt item and fix it
  • Demo work to the team and reflect on process changes
StageTypical ConversionNotes
Sourced or inbound100 percentTop of funnel
Positive response25 to 40 percentOutreach quality drives this
Intro call passed60 to 80 percentBe selective before scheduling
Technical screen passed30 to 50 percentGood tasks filter quickly
Onsite loop passed40 to 60 percentScorecard discipline matters
Offer extended70 to 90 percentCalibrate bar to stage
Offer accepted50 to 80 percentSpeed and clarity win here

Real-world scenarios 

  • Goal: shipping a paid pilot with two design partners in 90 days
  • Hiring plan: one senior full-stack product engineer employee, one part-time contractor on frontend polish
  • Stack: React, Node, Postgres, Docker on a managed platform, simple CI, basic monitoring
  • Cost: 165k salary pro-rated, 0.75 percent equity, contractor at 80 per hour for 20 hours weekly
  • Why: one accountable owner backed by flexible capacity
  • Goal: stabilize iOS app, add analytics, grow to 5k DAU
  • Hiring plan: iOS senior, backend with growth analytics skills, part-time designer
  • Stack: SwiftUI, Kotlin or cross-platform choice if justified, backend in a language your team knows, events collection pipeline
  • Notes: invest in crash reporting, release process, and AB testing early
  • Goal: build the data ingestion layer, first ML model in production
  • Hiring plan: backend data engineer with streaming experience, MLOps-minded engineer, part-time SRE
  • Stack: Python, dbt, Airflow or Dagster, warehouse first, feature store later
  • Guardrails: security and privacy hygiene early, clearly defined SLAs for data freshness
  • Early idea stage: start with top down market analysis to avoid building for tiny niches by accident. Then sketch a minimal bottom-up plan to show you know how revenue happens.
  • Post-MVP with a handful of customers: lead with bottom-up market analysis tied to actual conversion, price, and churn. Keep a top-down number in the appendix for context.
  • Growth rounds: run both in detail. Use the hybrid approach to justify the hiring plan and channel bets.

Tools for hiring with speed and quality

  • ATS: Ashby or Lever, light automation with readable scorecards
  • Coding tasks: GitHub Classroom, a private repo with GitHub Actions for tests
  • Sourcing: LinkedIn Recruiter Lite, GitHub search, niche boards
  • References: standardized form with 4 to 6 targeted questions
  • Notion or Coda: candidate briefs, interview plan, decision docs
  • Slack channel for each role: centralize updates, reduce drift
  • Calendly or Motion: eliminate scheduling friction

EVNE Developers is a dedicated software development team with a product mindset.
We’ll be happy to help you turn your idea into life and successfully monetize it.

A practical checklist you can run this week

  • Write a 90-day outcomes brief for the role
  • Build a four-part scorecard with rubrics
  • Draft a succinct outreach message with a product brief attached
  • Prepare a 90-minute work sample repo with tests
  • Schedule a tight interview loop across two days
  • Define an offer range with equity ready
  • Line up two references you can offer to the candidate
  • Draft an onboarding plan for week 1 and week 4

Conclusion

Hiring for a fantasy stack instead of a ship-ready stack

Letting process drag for weeks and losing the best candidates

Outsourcing all quality thinking to agencies without code ownership

Treating candidates like vendors instead of future partners

Overvaluing cleverness over reliability and taste

Ignoring the comp realities of your geography and stage

Skipping reference checks or asking weak questions

The average time to hire a developer for a startup can range from 25 to 35 days.

Roman Bondarenko is the CEO of EVNE Developers. He is an expert in software development and technological entrepreneurship and has 10+years of experience in digital transformation consulting in Healthcare, FinTech, Supply Chain and Logistics.